Home > Group Policy, Microsoft, Server Based Computing, Windows Server > Problems using Group Policy to set a mandatory profile…

Problems using Group Policy to set a mandatory profile…

Here’s a weird one i came across this week while configuring a mandatory profile, I was using my local laptop to configure group policy over the domain and could set the mandatory profile, but could not set the “Do not append the user name to the profile path” as it was missing from the group policy object!

After much head scratching we discovered an extra registry setting embedded in the group policy:

HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Policies\Microsoft\Windows NT\Terminal
Services\WFDontAppendUserNameToProfile dword = 1.

Still none the wiser to the issue we found the following article http://support.microsoft.com/kb/908011. With this we put two and two together, and logged into a 2003 domain controller (sp2) and low and behold the policy setting was available.

It seems the group policy were updated in service pack 2 to reflect an issue when trying to configure mandatory profiles, I do aim to copy the policies to my laptop and see if i can update them to reflect the change but I’ve been to lazy so far 🙂

Update: Well i got around to testing the policy copy, if you copy the .adm files from the domain controller to your local machine with the problem, it will resolve the issue.

Heres an example of scripting the change:

pushd \\domaincontroller\c$\windows\inf
copy *.adm %windir%\inf

That’s it. reload gpedit.msc and you should see hte entries correctly.

  1. No comments yet.
  1. No trackbacks yet.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

<span>%d</span> bloggers like this: